In my last posting (Why Leaders Don’t Learn from Success) I described how success can lead to failure as individuals and organisations fail to
learn as a direct result of their success.
As individuals we hold certain theories, models, principles and beliefs that guide our actions and our decision-making.
Sometimes these theories are quite sophisticated and rooted in science and in other cases they are pretty informal.
Learning is the process of updating our theories. We will typically challenge our assumptions, models and theories when something has gone wrong.
Failure provides a motivation for individuals (and organisations) to learn. This has been true from the time we first tried to walk or ride a bicycle. We fall down, it hurts and we try another approach.
An amazing number of high ranking executives report that early failures in their careers taught them lessons that ultimately led to their success. Without failure to provide the challenge, we need to challenge ourselves.
Here are five ways in which an organisation can learn from success:
As individuals we hold certain theories, models, principles and beliefs that guide our actions and our decision-making.
Sometimes these theories are quite sophisticated and rooted in science and in other cases they are pretty informal.
Learning is the process of updating our theories. We will typically challenge our assumptions, models and theories when something has gone wrong.
Failure provides a motivation for individuals (and organisations) to learn. This has been true from the time we first tried to walk or ride a bicycle. We fall down, it hurts and we try another approach.
An amazing number of high ranking executives report that early failures in their careers taught them lessons that ultimately led to their success. Without failure to provide the challenge, we need to challenge ourselves.
Here are five ways in which an organisation can learn from success:
- Celebrate
success but examine it - when a win is achieved, the organisation needs to
investigate what led to it with the same rigour and scrutiny it might
apply to understanding the causes of failure. This may be an uncomfortable
process and it may reveal tha a company’s major success was due to good
luk rather than good judgement.
- Institute
systematic project reviews – Pixar, which has had 11 hit animated films in
a row, conducts rigorous reviews of its production process. It religiously
collects data about all aspects of a production and uses this to
“stimulate discussion and challenge assumptions”. Staff don’t like doing
them and would prefer to celebrate a film’s success, but Ed Catmull, Pixar
President, sees the benefit of not becoming complacent.
- Use
the right time horizons – In industries such as pharmaceuticals and
aerospace, the development and feedback timeframe is long. It is critical
to keep the appropriate time frame in mind when reviewing performance
rather than focus on recent events.
- Apply
the root causes of the success – replicating success is important but that
does not mean creating a check list of all the things to do the same way
the next time. Break down each process into “something we can directly
control” and “something that is affected by external factors” and study
those elements under direct control using such tools as Six Sigma.
- If
it ain’t broke, experiment – in scientific research and in engineering,
designs are subjected to ever more rigorous tests until the thing they are
designing actually breaks. Organisational experiments can be conducted to
push boundaries, provided the cost and impact are managed.
Ironically, understanding success can better prepare you to avoid failure.
No comments:
Post a Comment